Use nominal rate for phase calculations
The local interval calculated by advance_spread() might oscillate too much in narrow intervals.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f1efce7e52
commit
c08f37da96
|
|
@ -883,11 +883,13 @@ FORCE_INLINE void isr() {
|
||||||
advance_spread(main_Rate);
|
advance_spread(main_Rate);
|
||||||
if (LA_phase >= 0) {
|
if (LA_phase >= 0) {
|
||||||
if (step_loops == e_step_loops)
|
if (step_loops == e_step_loops)
|
||||||
LA_phase = (eISR_Rate > main_Rate);
|
LA_phase = (current_block->advance_rate > main_Rate);
|
||||||
else {
|
else {
|
||||||
// avoid overflow through division. warning: we need to _guarantee_ step_loops
|
// avoid overflow through division. warning: we need to _guarantee_ step_loops
|
||||||
// and e_step_loops are <= 4 due to fastdiv's limit
|
// and e_step_loops are <= 4 due to fastdiv's limit
|
||||||
LA_phase = (fastdiv(eISR_Rate, step_loops) > fastdiv(main_Rate, e_step_loops));
|
auto adv_rate_n = fastdiv(current_block->advance_rate, step_loops);
|
||||||
|
auto main_rate_n = fastdiv(main_Rate, e_step_loops);
|
||||||
|
LA_phase = (adv_rate_n > main_rate_n);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue