Only SET_OUTPUT() and WRITE() for now, reading follows later.
A loop like this:
SET_OUTPUT(PIO0_1);
for (;;) {
WRITE(PIO0_1, 0);
WRITE(PIO0_1, 1);
}
toggles a pin at about 5.3 MHz. The low period is 63 ns on the
scope, so 3 clock cycles. With this loop, the binary is 1648
bytes.
Assembly shows four instructions inside the loop, which is about
as good as it can get:
movs r2, #0
str r2, [r3, #8]
adds r2, #2
str r2, [r3, #8]
For comparison, using the MBED provided gpio routines give a
toggle frequency of about 300 kHz, with a low period of 72 clock
cycles. Microoptimisation isn't just the last few percent ...
Tested with this code before main():
static void delay(uint32_t delay) {
while (delay) {
__ASM volatile ("nop");
delay--;
}
}
... and in main():
SET_OUTPUT(PIO0_1);
SET_OUTPUT(PIO0_2);
SET_OUTPUT(PIO0_3);
SET_OUTPUT(PIO0_4);
__ASM (".balign 16");
while (1) {
// 1 pulse on pin 1, two pulses on pin 2, ...
WRITE(PIO0_1, 0);
WRITE(PIO0_1, 1);
WRITE(PIO0_2, 0);
WRITE(PIO0_2, 1);
WRITE(PIO0_2, 0);
WRITE(PIO0_2, 1);
WRITE(PIO0_3, 0);
WRITE(PIO0_3, 1);
WRITE(PIO0_3, 0);
WRITE(PIO0_3, 1);
WRITE(PIO0_3, 0);
WRITE(PIO0_3, 1);
// PIO0_4 needs a pullup 10k to 3.3V
// to show a visible signal.
WRITE(PIO0_4, 0);
delay(10);
WRITE(PIO0_4, 1);
delay(10);
WRITE(PIO0_4, 0);
delay(10);
WRITE(PIO0_4, 1);
delay(10);
WRITE(PIO0_4, 0);
delay(10);
WRITE(PIO0_4, 1);
delay(10);
WRITE(PIO0_4, 0);
delay(10);
WRITE(PIO0_4, 1);
delay(1000);
}
With a 10k pullup, PIO0_4 has a rise time of about 1 microsecond.
Markus Hitter